By Burnett Munthali
The High Court in Lilongwe has today issued an interlocutory injunction restraining lawyer Alexious Kamangila from making, writing, or publishing any statements about High Court of Malawi Commercial Division Judge Kenan Manda until further notice. This ruling underscores the court’s commitment to upholding the integrity of its judicial officers and addressing any alleged defamatory statements.
Judge Manda’s lawyer, Michael Goba Chipeta, confirmed the development to Nation Online, stating that he had already emailed the injunction document to Kamangila due to the urgency of the matter. Chipeta elaborated, saying, “The court marshal also called the defendant in my presence to inform him that the other documents, including summons, are at the court. Kamangila informed the court marshal that he will advise where the documents should be delivered.”
The court order, issued by Judge Simeon Mdeza, warns Kamangila that he risks being held in contempt of court should he disobey the injunction. This legal action comes in response to allegations made by Kamangila in Facebook posts, in which he purportedly claimed that Judge Manda engaged in fraudulent conduct.
Attempts to reach Kamangila for comment were unsuccessful, as he did not respond to calls. The situation highlights the ongoing tensions within Malawi’s legal community, as allegations of misconduct are taken seriously by the judiciary.
In a demand letter issued earlier, Judge Manda is seeking K250 million in compensation from Kamangila for the alleged defamatory remarks made on social media. This case has drawn attention not only for its implications for the individuals involved but also for its potential impact on public trust in the judiciary.
As this legal battle unfolds, it raises important questions about the balance between free speech and the responsibility of individuals, particularly legal professionals, to maintain respect for the judiciary. The courtโs decision to issue an injunction reflects its intent to protect the dignity of its judges and the judicial process as a whole.
